Local Chorus
Local news from local sources, read in your language.
Settled
Verified

Takaichi does not rule out government bonds to fund food consumption tax cut

🇯🇵 Japan, Tokyo 06:31 Politics Business9 Official Community updated 13 h ago first reported by 産経新聞

In short

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi told the upper house Budget Committee on 19 October that she does not deny issuing government bonds, while saying she would appropriately control the full-year issuance amount. Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara later said the remark concerned the budget as a whole and that the government's policy had not changed. Takaichi said on X that her earlier policy of not relying on special deficit-financing bonds for the tax cut is unchanged.

Read the full story 2 min read

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said in the upper house Budget Committee on the morning of 19 October that she does not deny issuing government bonds as part of the funding for a consumption tax cut on food. She said she would scrutinise the scale of public finances and appropriately control the full-year bond issuance amount across the initial and supplementary budgets, as in the previous fiscal year. [ 3 , 7 , 8 , 12 ]

She was answering Yoshifumi Hamano (浜野喜史) of the Democratic Party for the People, who asked whether issuing bonds as needed would be a proper response. Nikkei reported that Hamano said that if funding came from reduced government spending, it could cancel out the effect of the tax cut. Takaichi also said she would review both spending and revenue within the framework of budget compilation reform, according to Asahi and Nikkei. [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]

Takaichi had previously said the cut would not rely on special bonds (deficit-financing bonds). Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara said at a press conference that she had spoken about the budget as a whole and that the government's policy had not changed. Nikkei and Mainichi reported that Takaichi posted on X that she meant that, for the budget as a whole, she does not deny bond issuance. Nikkei said she wrote that the policy of not relying on deficit-financing bonds for the cut is unchanged. A Tokyo Shimbun headline described the remarks as hinting at a policy shift. [ 8 , 12 , 13 , 17 ]

In the afternoon session, Mainichi reported, Takaichi told Taku Yamazoe (山添拓) of the Japanese Communist Party that the funding would be secured without relying on special bonds and that the concrete picture would be shown in the budget compilation process. Nikkei reported she said that of about 9 trillion yen in non-tax revenue, about 6 trillion yen has no designated use and she would consider adding to it. Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama said the tax special measures subject to review amount to at least about 1 trillion yen on a simple total. [ 8 , 17 ]

Takaichi also rejected the labels "Takaichi yen weakness" and "Takaichi high interest rates", saying she would raise confidence in the yen by building a strong economy. [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 12 ]

She apologised again over the effective dismissal of former agriculture minister Kazuo Yanagi (簗和生), saying that resigning does not remove a politician's accountability. Asked whether he should be summoned to the Diet, she said it is for the Diet to decide. Sankei and Mainichi reported she said Education Minister Yoshihiro Seki (関芳弘), who held a political fundraising party in a Diet members' office building, should reflect and carry on with his duties; Sankei said she learned of the issue only when it was reported. [ 3 , 9 , 12 , 17 ]

The two-day Budget Committee questioning ended on 19 October. The consumption tax cut bill, which the government and ruling parties regard as the most important of the session, was due to enter lower house deliberation on 20 October. [ 3 , 12 ]

Why it matters

The financing of the food consumption tax cut is the focus of the current Diet session, and the bill enters lower house deliberation on 20 October. Outlets differed on whether the remark signalled a shift or restated the existing line, and opposition parties are expected to keep pressing on the source of funds.

Key facts

  • On the morning of 19 October, Takaichi told the upper house Budget Committee that she would appropriately control the full-year government bond issuance amount and that this "does not deny" issuing government bonds. [ 3 , 7 , 12 ]
  • She was answering Yoshifumi Hamano (浜野喜史) of the Democratic Party for the People, who asked whether issuing bonds as needed would be a proper response. [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]
  • She said the full-year amount, covering the initial and supplementary budgets, would be controlled as in the previous fiscal year. [ 7 , 8 , 12 ]
  • Takaichi had previously said the tax cut would not rely on special bonds (deficit-financing bonds). [ 7 , 8 , 12 , 17 ]
  • Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara said at a press conference that she had spoken about the budget as a whole and that the government's policy had not changed. [ 12 , 17 ]
  • Takaichi posted on X that she meant that, for the budget as a whole, she does not deny bond issuance. [ 8 , 17 ]
  • The consumption tax cut bill was due to enter lower house deliberation on 20 October. [ 3 , 9 , 12 ]

Confirmed by several sources

  • Takaichi said in the upper house Budget Committee on 19 October that she does not deny issuing government bonds and will appropriately control the full-year issuance amount. [ 3 , 7 , 8 , 12 ]
  • Kihara said the remark concerned the budget as a whole and that the government's policy had not changed. [ 12 , 17 ]
  • Takaichi posted on X after the committee session that her remark referred to the budget as a whole. [ 8 , 17 ]
  • Takaichi rejected the labels "Takaichi yen weakness" and "Takaichi high interest rates". [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 12 ]
  • Takaichi apologised again over the effective dismissal of former agriculture minister Kazuo Yanagi (簗和生) and said resigning does not remove a politician's accountability. [ 3 , 5 , 12 , 17 ]

Still unclear

  • Whether the remark signals a change in how the tax cut will be funded. A Tokyo Shimbun headline said Takaichi hinted at a policy shift, while Kihara and Takaichi said the policy of not relying on special deficit-financing bonds is unchanged.
  • The concrete funding plan for the tax cut. Mainichi quoted Takaichi as saying the specifics will be shown in the budget compilation process; TBS said the funding and the recipients of the remaining 1% payment remain unclear.
  • Whether Yanagi will be summoned to the Diet. Opposition parties asked for it; Takaichi said it is for the Diet to decide.

What local media are saying

Business mediaJiji, Yomiuri, Kyodo (via Tokyo Shimbun and Nishi-Nippon Shimbun), Asahi, Nikkei, Sankei and TBS reported her quotes on bond issuance and the pledge to control the amount. Nikkei, Sankei and Mainichi added Kihara's statement and her X post. Tokyo Shimbun's headline suggested a shift in policy, while Mainichi framed it as a restatement of the existing line. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 ]
Official sourcesNHK reported that Takaichi said she would review both spending and revenue, examine the feasible scale of public finances and appropriately control the bond issuance amount for the budget as a whole. It also reported continued questioning over Yanagi and Education Minister Seki, and over the funding. [ 10 , 16 ]
Community and socialYahoo! News Japan's top item carried the headline that the prime minister does not deny government bonds as a source of tax cut funding. [ 4 ]

Timeline, local time

  1. Jiji Press reported Takaichi's remark that she does not deny issuing bonds, with the amount to be appropriately controlled. [ 1 ]
  2. Kyodo published its report on the Budget Committee session, in which Takaichi said she would appropriately control the full-year bond issuance amount. [ 5 ]
  3. Asahi Shimbun reported that the prime minister posted about her Budget Committee remark. [ 14 ]
  4. Nikkei reported her X post saying she does not deny bond issuance for the budget as a whole. [ 15 ]
  5. On 20 October, TBS reported that Takaichi told the lower house plenary session that combining a cut in the food tax rate with support payments is the best method, and that funding would not rely on deficit-financing bonds. [ 18 ]